The underground Church
not only suffered long years of persecution from the government, it also
suffered intense emotional pains in recent years from the insensitive treatment
and criticism from some members of the universal church. The steadfast loyalty
and obedience of the underground Church to the Pope were interpreted by many as
inflexibility and hostility towards the communist government sanctioned
Patriotic Association (P. A.); its refusal to join the P. A. is allegedly
the reason for the continued division of the Catholic Church in China. Some
"China experts" from the universal church felt strongly that unity in the
Catholic Church in China will be achieved only if the underground bishops will
put away their past and join the so-called "open church".
A few years ago, a
small number of the P. A. bishops confidentially requested recognition from the
Holy See. The Pope accepted these bishops. As the names of these bishops are
extremely confidential, many friends of the P. A. bishops inevitably claim that
the P. A. bishops they are assisting are the very bishops "confidentially
recognized" by the Pope. These "converted" P. A. bishops, with their dual
status, have not only retained their financial and political benefits from the
government, but also secured for them financial help and friendship from the
universal church. Unfortunately, some of these P. A. Bishops use this new dual
status to advance the causes of the P. A. rather than the Roman Catholic (R.
C.) Church. The following distressing situation illustrates the current
confusion in some parts of China:
Recently, a P. A.
Bishop received a letter from a Monsignor who was a Counselor to the Mission
of the Holy See in Hong Kong. This Monsignor authorized the same P. A.
bishop to:
Become the Ordinary of an underground Roman Catholic Diocese, and
Consecrate a P. A. priest of that same diocese as his coadjutor
bishop.
By virtue of the
same letter, the incumbent underground Ordinary appointed by the Holy See to
the same diocese was demoted to the position of auxiliary bishop to the
newly appointed P. A. Ordinary. This good underground Ordinary is now in
hiding.
The entire underground
Church in China is perturbed at how this loyal underground bishop who had been
jailed and tortured by the Chinese government many times could be demoted and be
forced to report to a P. A. bishop. The underground clergy and faithful of this
diocese are now under great pressure both from the government and from their new
P. A. bishop to join the Patriotic Association.
I must say that
forcing an underground Ordinary to report to a P. A. bishop must be the most
effective method yet conjured up by the Chinese Government to erode the fidelity
of the underground Church to the Supreme Pontiff. I have known of this event for
almost a year and have tortured myself in trying to keep it confidential in the
hope that the Vatican could resolve this issue. It has not been resolved. In the
meantime, this event has now been reported in the United States.
2)
Another American Parish Granting Full Faculties to the Patriotic Association
Priests.
Following the "example"
of the New York archdiocese, Archbishop Levada of San Francisco granted
faculties to a P. A. priest a few months ago, allowing him to offer Holy Mass
and administer other Sacraments in public. The fact that this priest was
a P. A. priest was not disclosed to the faithful. It is quite natural for any
individual receiving Sacraments from these P. A. priests in a R. C. Church to
believe that they are the R. C. priests. Would these same individuals still wish
to receive the Sacraments from this P. A. priest had these facts been told?
This event is obviously
contrary to the 1988 guidelines issued by His Eminence Cardinal Tomko. In his
China Advisory dated September 3, 1988 (Prot. 3314/88) to all world bishops,
Cardinal Tomko wrote:
Another rather
delicate point is the question of the liturgical celebrations. In fact, all
'communicatio in sacris' is to be avoided. The 'patriotic' bishops and
priests are not to be invited or even allowed to celebrate religious
functions in public, either in the churches or in the oratories of the
various religious institutes.
When we raised
questions to Archbishop Levada who sponsored this program, his answer was that
this program "is being carried out according to directives received from the
Holy See" without further specifics. When we asked him again for more
details, we did not receive his response.
The P.A. bishops
publicly and repeatedly stated that the Pope has no authority over the
Catholics in China, repudiating the Pope’s supreme legislative, executive, and
judicial authority to govern the entire Catholic Church. The P.A. priests
studying in U.S. are under the sponsorship of the P.A. bishops, consecrated by
the P.A. bishops and are committed to return to serve these P.A. bishops and the
P.A. diocese.
Pope John Paul II has
said quite plainly that "a Catholic(s) who wish(es) to remain such and to be
recognized as such cannot reject the principle of communion with the successor
of Peter"(Jan 1994, Manila). In view of the above publicly known facts
regarding the Patriotic Association priests and the Holy Father’s statement,
they cannot be considered in communion with the Pope, nor are they even Roman
Catholic priests. As such, how can they be granted full faculties in the United
States to administer Sacraments in public?
As the P. A. priests
and seminarians have publicized their continued commitment to return to serve
their P. A. bishops, (some have returned), they could not have made a true
lifelong conversion to the R. C. Church. The "proof" of their allegiance to the
Pope is to recite oncein private the Profession of Faith. This
same prayer is also recited in China, but did not deter these P.A. bishops from
upholding the principle of an independent Chinese Catholic Church, or from
publicly proclaiming that the Pope has no authority over Catholics in China.
How, then, can a public scandal be rectified with one "private" recitation of
the same profession of faith? The United States faithful deserve to know the
true position of these P. A. priests on the doctrine of the papal supremacy.
Many clergy in the free
world felt that the P.A. clergy is justified in joining the Patriotic
Association because of persecution. Throughout history, the same reasons have
caused different groups to be separated from the Church. Many clergy joined the
Church of England because of the persecution under Henry VIII. However, was St.
Thomas More inflexible, outdated or sacrificed needlessly? Was Bishop St. John
Fisher not facing a political reality? The separation of the Church of England
and that of the Patriotic Association are rather similar. Therefore, at most,
the P. A. clergy can only be as "catholic" as the clergy from the Church of
England were "Catholic". While we cannot ignore the truth that they "have
strayed in certain aspects from the fullness of Catholic truth" (Pope John Paul
II), we must love and pray for our separated brothers so that they may return to
the "One fold and One Shepherd".
Pope John Paul II is
well known for his deep love for China. Being a former underground seminarian
himself, the Holy Father understands only too well the painful reality and
suffering of a persecuted Church in a communist country. However, charity must
also be based on truth. In his speech to China in December 1996, the Holy Father
encouraged and demanded fidelity from the bishops. He said, "Through
ordination the Bishop receives the grace and the responsibility of his own
pastoral ministry.....The Bishop must be the first witness of the faith which he
professes and preaches, to the point of ‘shedding his blood’, as the
Apostles did and as so many other Pastors have done down the centuries, in many
nations and also in China."
The faithful who
receive the sacraments from a Patriotic Association clergy have a need and a
right to know:
By what
kind of theological reasoning do P.A. priests receive full faculties to
administer Sacraments openly in the Roman Catholic Church?
Is this
a change in Vatican’s policy, as previously the Holy Father has not
recognized the Patriotic Association? Is a basic doctrine of faith, e.g.
communion with the Vicar of Christ, dispensable when one is under
persecution?
3) Patriotic Association Seminarians Being Trained in the
United States
There are approximately
fifty P. A. seminarians and priests studying in various R. C. seminaries in the
United States for at least the last 6 years. Maryknoll on behalf of the P. A.
Seminarian Formation Committee organizes this program. The chairman of the
Committee is Bishop Aloysius Jin, the P. A.’s Bishop of Shanghai. Bishop Jin
often presented to his western benefactors his 18 years of imprisonment as proof
of his loyalty to the Holy See. What he did not say was that soon after his
arrest, he caved in to the pressure of the communist government and recorded a
tape to persuade the jailed Catholics to confess to the government and to join
the Patriotic Association. This tape was broadcasted in prison. He in fact chose
to serve the communist government from the very beginning of his imprisonment,
rather than to serve the Vicar of Christ. Soon after his release, he was awarded
the position of P.A. auxiliary bishop of Shanghai, and then the P.A. Bishop of
Shanghai. Many bishops in the United States support Bishop Jin’s seminarians’
program and offer these candidates full tuition, room, and board scholarships.
At the end of the training, the candidates are sent back to China, to be
ordained by P.A. bishops and to serve in the Patriotic Association. The U.S.
seminaries are not training them for the underground Roman Catholic bishops.
The U.S. bishops
alleged that this program has " the approval of Vatican". However, those who
have written to the bishops, to the rectors of these seminaries, or even to
Vatican officials failed to receive any explanation as to why the diocese and
the Holy See promote an independent Church who has repeatedly and openly
declared its autonomy from the Pope.
4) Roman
Catholic Religious Working In China Without Approval From The Underground Church
Section 678 of the
Canon Law stated that all religious organizations working in a diocese must
receive the approval from the Ordinary of that diocese. In recent years, many
missionaries returned to China and started various charitable projects. These
foreign missionaries do not seek permission for their projects from or work with
the underground bishops who were appointed by the Pope. Instead, they work with
the Patriotic Association or with the communist government. It is very sad to
note that the R. C. missionaries of the free world ignore their duly appointed
bishops and prefer to serve bishops approved by the communist government.
I personally cannot
imagine that any religious orders would carry out an unauthorized project in a
diocese of the United States. If this unauthorized ministry indeed should not
happen in the United States or elsewhere in the world, why should it occur in
China? Why then the double standard?
5)
Deceptive Propaganda
Numerous articles have
appeared in the diocesan newspapers, and Catholic magazines, about the "Catholic
Church in China", but in fact describing the P. A. without naming it as such.
Numerous tours to China have been organized by Roman Catholic institutions such
as the China Bureau headed by a Maryknoll sister. These tours were advertised to
visit churches and seminaries of the "Catholic Church in China", but in fact,
they visited the P. A.’s facilities. Many conferences have been sponsored by R.
C. institutions such as the U. S. National Conference of Catholic Bishops
ostensibly for the "Catholic Church in China", but in effect focused mainly on
the P A's church. Along the way, the loyal underground Catholic Church, its
persecutions and sufferings were scarcely mentioned, if at all. These articles,
tours and seminars have badly deceived the public.
Besides showing
"charity" to our separated brothers by generously supporting the P. A. with the
resources of the universal church, the leaders of our Church in America should
also teach loyalty and obedience to the Vicar of Christ by supporting and
preaching about the suffering underground Church in China as an example to the
Catholic Church in America.
6) Is The
Patriotic Association The Same As The Roman Catholic Church?
Recently, many
religious and bishops claim that the underground Church and the P. A. Church are
the same Church having the same faith. They advocated not taking sides, because
we are all Catholic. This view is totally wrong.
The Cardinal Kung
Foundation would like to present the following facts to you:
The most
important tenet in the constitution of the Patriotic Association is its
autonomy from the Pope. It does not recognize the supreme
administrative, legislative and judicial authority of the Pope
regardless of the fact that its members publicly professed their
"loyalty" to His Holiness. This autonomy is the fundamental divergence
in theology between the Patriotic Association and the Roman Catholic
Church.
We know that no
one can possibly claim communion with the Pope and with the universal
church while simultaneously denying the administrative, legislative, and
judicial authority of the Roman Pontiff. Inasmuch as the Patriotic
Association refuses to recognize the Pope’s authority as stated in their
constitution, it could not possibly be in communion with the Pope.
Without such communion, the Patriotic Association could not be Roman
Catholic.
Cannon Law
Section 751 states "…Schism is the refusal of submission to the
Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to
him."
The Patriotic
Association continues to refuse submission to the Roman Pontiff. Its
bishops continue to be consecrated without a papal mandate. This has
been done for the last four decades.
One element of
schism for bishops is the false claim of jurisdiction. Inasmuch as all
these Patriotic Association bishops claim jurisdiction over a diocesan
territory, they complete this element of schism. Accordingly, the
Patriotic Association is a schismatic church. However, why is the
Vatican not declaring it? Since Pope Pius XII, Vatican has been silent.
Some Catholic defenders of the Patriotic Association use this as a
conclusive evidence that the Patriotic Association is Catholic. Will the
Chief Shepherd not "leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and, go
after the one which is lost, until he finds it?" (Luke 15:4). In spite
of his immense love for China and the most difficult political condition
in China, His Holiness always leaves a venue open for the separated
brothers to return to the one true Church. This love hardly concludes
that the doctrine of communion with the Pope has been changed. On the
contrary, Holy Father demanded that the church in China must "keep
itself united to Christ, to the Successor of Peter and to the whole
universal Church, also and especially through the ministry of Bishops in
communion with the Apostolic See. This is a truth of faith."(Pope John
Paul II, Dec 3, 96)
7) Donations to
the Patriotic Association
Patriotic Association
priests and bishops, presenting themselves as bona fide Catholic clerics,
traveled around the world and solicited donations. Catholic institutions donated
millions to the Patriotic Association while the underground loyal bishops were
left with almost nothing. Unfortunately, the expression of the loyal bishops is
severely limited. They are prohibited to do so in China because of their illegal
status, and are not allowed to travel outside China to spread their message. The
mission of The Cardinal Kung Foundation is therefore to bring the message and
the life of the underground Church, and its continued persecution, to the
world’s attention.
It is one matter to
donate money out of an ecumenical spirit to our separated brethren. It is even
more necessary to support our loyal Catholic brethren in China who are suffering
so much for the faith. As we have stated above, such donations, if any, are
nominal. In the meantime, horrendous persecution of the underground Church
continues.
Conclusion
Many Cardinals and
Bishops claim that they carried out the above events to promote
"reconciliation", as directed by the Holy See. Reconciliation cannot be done by
compromising faith. Reconciliation is possible only with "full and complete
visible union of Pastors and faithful alike, around the Pope." The Holy
Father "exhorts all the Pastors and the faithful of China to express with
courage and without fear the true profession of Catholic faith, ‘thus speaking
the truth in love’." (J P II 12/96).
Many Roman Catholic
bishops and missionaries believe that working with the Patriotic Association
Church would be the most effective means of propagating the faith in China. If
this were their true objective, these institutions should first consult with the
loyal underground bishops who have over 40 years of experience under communist
China, increasing the loyal underground Church from 3 million in the 1959’s to
the current 8 million. They have not consulted with the underground bishops.
These religious orders did not extend the same respect to the underground
bishops as Ordinaries as they would have accorded to other Ordinaries in the
free world. These Bishops and religious superiors appear to support and
recognize the Patriotic Association while our Holy Father has steadfastly
refused to do so.
The 8 million loyal
Catholics are very broken-hearted and confused. In their hearts, they know that
"Papal Supremacy" is one of the fundamentals of being a Catholic. In their
hearts, they know that Holy Father is firmly behind them. In their hearts, they
know that Holy Father will never abandon them. However, facing all these
confusing and contradicting events, the loyal Catholics are experiencing a far
more painful persecution by the acts of our own Church than being just
physically abused and locked up in a communist jail.
The Communist
Government did not succeed in eliminating the millions of Catholics by coercion
and persecution for almost five decades. Now the Government is hoping to defeat
the Roman Catholic Church from within through misinformation, deceit, and
confusion in addition to the forty years of intensified persecution from
without. The Chinese Government is trying hard to erode the respect, confidence,
obedience and loyalty of the underground church to the Holy Father through the
current confusion and conflicting signals. So, when the chips are down, the
issue of the papal authority of the Catholic Church in China would become
irrelevant. We are most concerned that the communists are gaining ground
rapidly. Please help China and the underground Bishops with your prayers, your
voice and your sacrificial donations. We need you, and your friends.