Recently, there has been a lot of controversy over stem cell
research. Even the late President Reagan’s son, Ron, gave a
speech at the Democratic convention approving stem cell
research. John Kerry recently has been giving speeches endorsing
stem cell research. What do we, as Catholics, believe about
this?
The issue concerning stem cell research certainly has entered the
spotlight in the media and has become a very highly politicized issue.
The problem is not with the research itself, but from whom one obtains
the stem cells. Stem cells are like "master cells" that turn into other
types of cells, like nerve, stomach, or brain cells. If one obtains
adult stem cells from sources like fat and umbilical cord blood, such
research is morally permissible.
In fact, such research has shown promising results. Adult stem cells
have been used in bone marrow transplants and in treatments of blood
disorders and leukemia. Companies using adult stem cells are currently
conducting clinical tests on treatments for heart attacks, liver
disease, bone and cartilage diseases and brain disorders, including
Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Saul J. Sharkis of Johns Hopkins University
recently published a study in which bone marrow stem cells from animal
donors were converted into healthy liver cells. He stated in the
Washington Post (8/20/04), "It is mind-blowing stuff. I never would
have thought this possible."
On the other hand, stem-cell research may also use embryonic stem cells.
These stem cells are obtained by producing an embryo in vitro (i.e. in
the laboratory) by fertilizing an ovum, allowing it to develop for a few
days in a petri dish, and then extracting the cells, thereby killing the
embryo. Such research using embryonic stem cells is immoral.
The Catholic Church has consistently asserted that a human being
must be respected as a person from the first moment of conception, the
very first instance of existence. Each person is made in the image and
likeness of God, and thereby has an inherent dignity beyond the rest of
creation. The Declaration on Procured Abortion stated:
From the time that the ovum is fertilized, a new life is begun which
is neither that of the father nor of the mother; it is rather the
life of a new human being with his own growth. It would never be
made human if it were not human already. To this perpetual
evidence...modern genetic science brings valuable confirmation. It
has demonstrated that, from the first instant, the program is fixed
as to what this living being will be: a man, this individual man
with his characteristic aspects already well determined. Right from
fertilization is begun the adventure of human life, and each of its
great capacities requires time...to find its place and to be in a
position to act (nos. 12-13).
Moreover, we believe that Almighty God creates and infuses an immortal
soul, which truly gives each of us that identity of one made in His
image and likeness. Never should any person forget that he or she
started life as that one unique cell at the moment of conception.
Therefore, with embryonic stem-cell research, the subject matter is a
person who is purposely created to be destroyed. In 1961, Blessed Pope
John XXIII taught, "The transmission of human life is entrusted by
nature to a personal and conscious act and as such is subject to the
all-holy laws of God: immutable and inviolable laws which must be
recognized and observed (Mater et Magistra). Such moral laws
include the following: First, a child has a right to be respected as a
person from the moment of conception until natural death. Second, a
child has the right to be the fruit of the conjugal love of his parents,
who are united in marriage. Third, a child has a right to be born. (Cf.
Donum vitae, II, 8.) Given these moral laws, the production of
human beings for the sake of experimentation, research, or the
harvesting of organs is morally wrong. Human beings are not disposable
biological material (Donum vitae, I, 5).
Nevertheless, a great push currently exists for embryonic stem-cell
research. This push comes from celebrities with disabilities. Actors
Christopher Reeve and Michael J. Fox made many public appearances, even
before Congress, promoting embryonic stem-cell research. In their
consciences, they must not have been aware that they desire the death of
someone else to save their own lives. Yet, their pleas, coupled with
their conditions, and especially since Christopher Reeve's death, have
pulled at the heartstrings of many people who make moral decisions based
on feelings rather than on rational thinking.
This push has motivated legislators to promote this cause. For instance,
the California Stem Cell Research and Cure Initiative, proposed
legislation, would require the spending of $295 million each year over a
10-year period for embryonic stem-cell research. The legislation does
permit "somatic cell nuclear transfer" research, which is technically a
type of cloning. The proponents of this legislation plead that this
research would "significantly reduce state health care costs in the
future," which of course cannot be proven or guaranteed. Abandoning
rational thinking (even their professed faith), too many politicians
play on the emotional feelings of others just to get one more vote.
Keep in mind there is no real proof that embryonic stem-cell
research will bring about any more benefit than adult stem-cell
research. While the question mentioned Ron Reagan’s speech at the
Democratic convention this past summer, his brother Michael Reagan
rebutted, defending the position of his late father, President Reagan.
Michael quoted his father’s 1983 statement: "My administration is
dedicated to the preservation of America as a free land and there is no
cause more important for preserving that freedom than affirming the
transcendent right to life of all human beings, the right without which
no other rights have any meaning." He then quoted Dr. Ronald McKay, a
stem cell researcher at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke: "‘People need a fairy tale,’ he said, explaining why
scientists have allowed society to believe wrongly that stem cells are
likely to effectively treat Alzheimer’s disease. He added, ‘Maybe that’s
unfair, but they need a story line that’s relatively simple to
understand.’"
Reagan also quoted Michael Fumento, whom he called "one of the nation’s
most skilled debunkers of junk science": "Over the horizon are so-called
adult stem cells, extracted from people of any age and from umbilical
cords and placentas. Not only don’t they carry the moral baggage of
embryonic stem cells, but research with them is much further along.
Unfortunately, embryonic stem-cell researchers have so powerful a PR
machine that many influential people don’t even know there’s an
alternative" (syndicated column, 6/22/04). Remember that even if
embryonic stem-cell research were promising, it would remain immoral
because it involves the purposeful creation and destruction of an
innocent human being.
While we may have the technology "to do" something, we
do not necessarily have the moral mandate "to do" something. Just
because we can do it, does not mean it ought to be done. Researchers
cannot simply think and act as though they are free to do anything
without being subject to moral parameters. We find ourselves slipping
further down the slope of morality: First came the legislation and
proliferation of contraception, then abortion, then in vitro
fertilization, the cloning of animals and now embryonic stem-cell
research. Of course we should not forget the proliferation of
doctor-assisted suicide. The moral laws have been abandoned.
Pope John Paul II in his great encyclical The Gospel of Life (Evangelium
Vitae) taught: "The first and fundamental step towards this cultural
transformation consists in forming consciences with regard to the
incomparable and inviolable worth of every human life. It is of the
greatest importance to re-establish the essential connection between
life and freedom. There are inseparable goods: where one is violated,
the other also ends up being violated. There is no true freedom where
life is not welcomed and loved.... No less critical in the formation of
conscience is the recovery of the necessary link between freedom and
truth.... When freedom is detached from objective truth, it becomes
impossible to establish personal rights on a first rational basis; and
the ground is laid for society to be at the mercy of the unrestrained
will of individuals or the oppressive totalitarianism of public
authority" (no. 96). The time has come for true Catholics and all
Christians to promote genuine freedom and truth in the defense of all
human life.
This article is reprinted with permission from Arlington Catholic
Herald.
THE AUTHOR
Father William Saunders is dean of the Notre Dame Graduate School of
Christendom College and pastor of Our Lady of Hope Parish in Sterling,
Virginia. The above article is a "Straight Answers" column he wrote for
the Arlington Catholic Herald. Father Saunders is also the author
of
Straight Answers, a book based on 100 of his columns and
published by Cathedral Press in Baltimore.