No
mother whose son has won distinction for himself, either in a profession or
in the field of battle, believes that the respect paid her for being his
mother detracts from the honor or dignity that is paid her son. Why, then,
do some minds think that any reverence paid to the Mother of Jesus detracts
from His Power and Divinity? We know the false rejoinder of those who say
that Catholics "adore" Mary or make her a "goddess," but that is a lie.
Since no reader of these pages would be guilty of such nonsense, it shall be
ignored.
Where do this coldness, forgetfulness, and, at the least, indifference
to the Blessed Mother start? From a failure to realize that her Son, Jesus,
is the Eternal Son of God. The moment I put Our Divine Lord on the same
level with Julius Caesar or Karl Marx, with Buddha or Charles Darwin, that
is, as a mere man among men, then the thought of special reverence to His
Mother as different from our mothers becomes positively repellent. Each
famous man has his mother, too. Each person can say: "I have my mother, and
mine is as good as or better than yours." That is why little is written of
the mothers of any great men?because each mother was considered the best
mother by her son. No one mother of a mortal is entitled to more love than
any other mother. Therefore no sons and daughters should be required to
single out someone else's mother as the Mother of mothers.
Our Lord described John the Baptist as "the greatest man ever born of
woman". Suppose that a cult were started to honor his mother, Elizabeth, as
superior to any other mother? Who among us would not rebel against it as
excessive? Everything the critics would say of such exaggeration would be
well taken, for the simple reason that John the Baptist is only a man. If
Our Lord is just another man, or another ethical reformer, or another
sociologist, then we share, even with the most bigoted, the resentment
against thinking that the Mother of Jesus is different from any other
mother.
The Fourth Commandment says: "Honor thy father and thy mother." It says
nothing about honoring Gandhi's mother or Napoleon's father. But the
Commandment to honor our fathers does not preclude adoring the Heavenly
Father. If the Heavenly Father sends His Divine Son to this earth, then the
Commandment to honor our earthly mothers does not preclude venerating the
Mother of the Son of God.
If Mary were only the mother of another man, then she could not also be
our mother, because the ties of the flesh are too exclusive. Flesh allows
only one mother. The step between a mother and a stepmother is long, and few
there are who can make it. But Spirit allows another mother. Since Mary is
the Mother of God, then she can be the Mother of everyone whom Christ
redeemed.
The key to understanding Mary is this: We do not start with Mary. We
start with Christ, the Son of the Living God! The less we think of Him, the
less we think of her; the more we think of Him, the more we think of her;
the more we adore His Divinity, the more we venerate her Motherhood; the
less we adore His Divinity, the less reason we have for respecting her. We
could even resent hearing her name, if we had become so perverse as not to
believe in Christ the Son of God. Never will it be found that anyone who
really loves Our Lord as a Divine Savior dislikes Mary. Those who dislike
any devotion to Mary are those who deny His Divinity or find fault with Our
Lord because of what He says about hell, divorce, and judgment.
It is on account of Our Divine Lord that Mary receives special
attention, and not on account of herself. Left to herself, her motherhood
would dissolve into humanity. But when seen in the light of His Divinity,
she becomes unique. Our Lord is God Who became man. Never before or since
did Eternity become time in a woman, nor did Omnipotence take on the bonds
of flesh in a maid. It is her Son who makes her motherhood different.
A Catholic boy from a parochial school was telling a university
professor who lived next door about the Blessed Mother. The professor
scoffed at the boy, saying: "But there is no difference between her and my
mother." The boy answered: "That's what you say, but there's a heck of a lot
of difference between the sons."
That is the answer. It is because Our Lord is so different from other
sons that we set His Mother apart from all mothers. Because He had an
Eternal Generation in the bosom of the Father as the Son of God and a
temporal generation in the womb of Mary as the Son of Man, His coming
created a new set of relationships. She is not a private person; all other
mothers are. We did not make her different; we found her different. We did
not choose Mary; He did.
But why was there a Virgin Birth? Because Christ is the Son of God, we
cannot be as indifferent to the circumstances of His birth as we would be to
the birth of the butcher or the baker. If Mary told the Apostles after
Pentecost about His virgin birth, it must have made a difference; if the
Apostles put it in their Creed and teaching, it must have made a difference.
Once Christ is accepted as the Son of God, there is immediate interest not
only in His prehistory, which John describes in the Prologue of his Gospel,
but also in His history and particularly in His birth.
Is the Virgin Birth fitting and becoming? The challenge to our faith in
the Virgin Birth is not related by anyone (except in the Jewish Talmud) to
sinfulness on Mary's part. The challenge concerns the physical possibility
of a miraculous process of life. By keeping His Mother absolutely stainless,
He has prevented the doubts about His Divine Paternity from being such that
they would wound her heart, her womanly heart. It is impossible for us to
imagine or feel, even to a slight degree, the vast ocean of love of Christ
for His Mother. Yet if even we were faced with the problem of keeping the
miasmic breath of scandal from our own mothers, what would we not do? And is
it therefore hard to believe that the omnipotent Son of God would do all in
His power to protect His Own Mother? With this in mind, there are many
conclusions apparent.
No great triumphant leader makes his entrance into the city over
dust-covered roads when he could come on a flower-strewn avenue. Had
Infinite Purity chosen any other port of entrance into humanity but that of
human purity, it would have created a tremendous difficulty?namely, how
could He be sinless if He was born of sin-laden humanity? If a brush dipped
in black becomes black, and if cloth takes on the color of the dye, would
not He, in the eyes of the world, have also partaken of the guilt in which
all humanity shared? If He came to this earth through the wheatfield of
moral weakness, He certainly would have some chaff hanging on the garment of
His human nature.
Putting the problem in another way: How could God become man and yet be
a sinless man and the Head of the new Humanity? First of all, He had to be a
perfect man in order to act in our name, to plead our defense, and to pay
our debt. If I am arrested for speeding, you cannot walk into the courtroom
and say: "Judge, forget it, I will take the blame." If I am drowning, I
cannot save anyone else who is drowning. Unless Our Lord is outside the
sin-current of humanity, He cannot be Our Savior. "If the blind lead the
blind, then both fall into the pit," said Our Lord. If He was to be the new
Adam, the new Head of Humanity, the Founder of a new corporation or Mystical
Body of regenerated humanity, as Adam was the head of fallen humanity, then
He also had to be different from all other men. He had to be absolutely
perfect, sinless, the Holy of Holies, all that God ever conceived man to be.
Such is the problem: How could God become man and yet be sinless man
without Original Sin? How, in the language of St. Paul, could He "be like
unto us in all things save sin"? How could He be a man, by being born of a
woman? He could be a sinless man by being born of a virgin. The first
statement is obvious: that He is born of a woman, then He shares in our
humanity. But how would being born of a virgin make Him free from Original
Sin?
Now, it must never be thought that the Incarnation would have been
impossible without the Virgin Birth. Rash, indeed, would be the human mind
to dictate to Almighty God the methods that He should use in coming to this
earth. But once the Virgin Birth is revealed, then it is proper for us to
inquire into its fitness, as we are now doing. The Virgin Birth is important
because of its bearing upon the solidarity of the human race in guilt. The
human race became incorporated to the first Adam by being born of the flesh;
incorporation to the new Adam, Christ, is by being born of the spirit, or
through a virgin birth. Thanks to it, we see how Our Blessed Lord entered
into the sinful race from the outside. Therefore, upon Him the curse did not
rest, save as He freely bore it for those whom He redeemed by His blood.
Nowhere do the New Testament writers argue from the Virgin Birth to the
Godhead of the Virgin-born. Rather do they argue from it His sinless
humanity.
To sum up: in order that Jesus Christ might be a descendant of Adam, he
had to be born of a daughter of Adam. But the process of generation and
birth of any individual is invisible. The only way to show that this process
in the birth of Christ was miraculous was to have its invisible workings
develop in a woman agreed by all to be incapable of having experienced the
process?a virgin. Joseph, the just man, stood for all humanity when in his
heart he questioned the fidelity of Mary. More than any other person he knew
how cruel it was to place that doubt even in the face of the most
incontrovertible evidence. He witnessed to Mary's immaculate life and her
amiability even before her Son was born. His doubt was settled by Heaven
itself. St. Joseph, more than any other human being on this earth, had a
right to know the circumstances surrounding the birth of Jesus. And just as
any husband is the prime witness of the fidelity of his wife, so, too, is
Joseph in the case of Mary, his spouse.
As Father Joseph Tennant points out, there is a type of this miraculous
birth in the story of Abraham and Sara. When they journeyed down to Egypt,
Abraham asked Sara to say that she was his sister rather than his wife, lest
the Egyptians kill him. The Pharaoh took her into his household. How long
she lived with the Egyptian King is not indicated, but some space of time,
and the Pharaoh and his household were punished with a sickness because of
it. He finally dismissed both Abraham and Sara from his palace. There is no
expression of divine wrath reported in this case. But after God had promised
that Sara would bear a son whose father would be Abraham, it was important
that there be no doubt in Abraham's mind or in anybody else's about the
paternity of Sara's son. Some time after the promise, in Gerara, there was
danger that the King, Abimelech, would take her into his harem. With
shameful cowardice Abraham permitted it to be done. (He was punished for
this when God ordered him to [missing text].
Mary was not sinless because she was a virgin, but the best sign of her
sinlessness was her virginity. Just as the Gospels prove the humble humanity
of Christ by naming among his ancestors Lamech, the boastful murderer;
Abraham, the coward; Jacob, the liar; Judas, the adulterer; Ruth, the pagan;
David, the murderer and adulterer; and many idolatrous kings, showing that
He was like to us in all things except sin, so, too, the same Gospels
disassociate Mary from all sin in order to show her to be as much as
possible "in the image and likeness of God." Mary was of the house of David,
but Christ's relationship to that line is not given through Mary, but
through Joseph, His foster father. And it had to be that the Mother of God
was sinless in order that we might more easily believe that she had flung
before the face of the world woman's greatest challenge to sin -- the vow of
virginity -- and kept it and made it bear divine fruit.
We do not believe that Jesus is God because He was born of a virgin
mother, as the Apostles and Evangelists did not believe it for that reason
alone. We believe in the Divinity of Christ because of the evidence of the
Resurrection, the marvel of the Gospel portrait, the growth of the Church,
the miracles and prophecies of Christ, the consonance of His doctrine with
the aspirations of the human heart. The Virgin Birth is rather related to
the manhood of Christ and His separateness from the sin that affected all
men who are born of the union of man and woman. Far from treating the Virgin
Birth as the dazzling mark of Divinity, the Te Deum regards it as Our Lord's
sublime condescension to the lowly conditions of humanity:
When thou tookest upon Thee to deliver man: Thou didst not abhor the
Virgin's womb.
The Virgin Birth is the safeguard of the sinlessness of the human nature
that Our Blessed Lord assumed. The only salvation that is given to men on
this earth is in the name of Him Who as God Himself entered the ranks of
sinful men. That no one should ever deny He was a man, He was born like the
rest of men from the womb of a woman?a fact that so scandalized Marcion that
he said: "A babe wrapped in swaddling clothes is not the kind of a God that
I will adore."
In the Incarnation, God the Son initiates the process of the re-creation
of His own earlier and disordered creation by the method of clothing Himself
with those very elements within it that had fallen into disarray. For the
first time since the Fall of Man, a completely perfected unit of humanity is
created in the world. This humanity is united substantially to the very
Person of the Son of God.
What do all denials of the Virgin Birth testify? Generally, to the
subtle attempt to pull down the new order of humanity and the race of the
second Adam into the unredeemed world of the old Adam. If a human father
supplied the human nature of Christ, then Christ is not the new Adam. The
Virgin Birth keeps the Divine initiative of Redemption to God Himself. If
the initiation of the new order is given to man, then it is taken from God.
Without the Virgin Birth, Our Lord would be entangled in a sinful humanity.
With it, He is incarnate in humanity without its sin. By getting rid of the
Virgin Birth, one seeks to get rid of the Divine initiative within the race
of the new Adam. The early heretics doubted the humanity of Our Lord, and so
they denied that He had a human mother. Modern agnostics doubt the true
Divinity, so they add a human father to His parentage.
There is never any danger that men will think too much of Mary; the
danger is that they will think too little of Christ. Coldness toward Mary is
a consequence of indifference to Christ. Any objection to calling her the
"Mother of God" is fundamentally an objection to the Deity of Christ. The
consecrated term Theotokos, "Mother of God," has ever since 432 been the
touchstone of the Christian Faith. It was not that the Church then had the
intention of expanding Mariology; it was rather that she was concerned with
Christological orthodoxy. As John of Damascus said: "This name contains the
whole mystery of the Incarnation." Once Christ is diminished, humanized,
naturalized, there is no longer any use for the term "Mother of God." It
implies a twofold generation of the Divine Word: one eternal in the bosom of
the Father, the other temporal in the womb of Mary. Mary therefore did not
bear a "mere man" but the "true God." No new person came into the world when
Mary opened the portals of [mkssing text].
It will be discovered that so-called Christians who think they believe
in the Divinity of Christ but do not believe in Mary as the Mother of God
fall generally into four ancient heresies. They are Adoptionists, who
believe that Christ was a mere man but after birth was adopted by God as His
Son. Or they are Nestorians, who held that Mary gave birth to a man who had
only a close union with Divinity. Or they are Eutychians, who denied the
human nature of Christ and hence made Mary merely an instrument in a
theophany. Or they are Docetists, holding that Christ's nature was only a
phantom or an appearance. Those who are offended at reverence paid Mary, if
they will analyze their thoughts, will discover that they are holding a
Docetist or some similar ancient error. Even if they profess the Divinity of
Christ in His earthly existence, such people shrink from affirming that His
human nature is glorified with Him at the right hand of the Father, where He
makes intercession for us. As [missing text].
The Virgin Birth, indeed, was a new type of generation. As our mind
begets a thought without in any way destroying the mind, so Mary begot the
Word within herself without in any way affecting her virginity. There are
various ways of generating, but the three principal ways are carnal,
intellectual, and Divine. The carnal is sexual, whether it be in animals or
in humans. Second is the generation of a thought within the mind. I take the
idea of "fortitude." That thought, or word (for it is a word even before I
pronounce it), does not exist in the outside world. It has neither weight,
nor color, nor longitude. Whence came it, then? It was begotten by the
chaste generation of the mind. This intellectual generation is really a
feeble image of the spiritual order of the Eternal Generation of the Son by
the Father. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God." God thinks a thought or a Word. But God does not think
many thoughts or words. He thinks only [missing text].
God willed that there be another kind of generation that would be
neither wholly intellectual nor wholly carnal but, in the order of flesh,
would reflect His eternal generation in time. God willed to take on a human
nature like our own through a virgin, while conserving the virginity of His
Mother, and showing precisely that He is the Word of God. As our mind does
not alter or destroy itself in the begetting of a thought, so neither does
the virginal body of Our Blessed Mother go through any alteration in
begetting Him, as the Son of God made man. The Word of God willed that His
generation in the order of the flesh and in time be elevated with as close a
resemblance as possible to His Heavenly generation.
Christ is a Mediator between God and humanity; Mary is the Mediatrix
between Christ and us. Our Lord is a Mediator between God and man. A
mediator is like a bridge that unites two opposite banks of a river, except
that here the bridge is between Heaven and earth. As you cannot touch the
ceiling without a stepladder acting as a mediator, so sinful man could not
in justice reach God, except by One Who mediated and was both God and man.
As man, He could act in our name, take on our sins; as one of us, He redeems
us on the Cross and gives us new life in His Resurrection. But as God, His
words, miracles, and death have an infinite value, and therefore He restores
more than we lost. God became man without ceasing to be either God or man
and therefore is our Mediator, Our Savior, Our Divine Lord.
As we study His Divine life, seeing Him as the first refugee persecuted
by a cruel government, working as a carpenter, teaching, and redeeming, we
know that it all began when He took on our human nature and became man. If
He had never taken on our human flesh, we would never have heard His Sermon
on the Mount or have seen Him forgive those who dug His hands and feet with
nails on the Cross. But the Woman gave Our Lord His human nature. He asked
her to give Him a human life?to give Him hands with which to bless children,
feet with which to go in search of stray sheep, eyes with which to weep over
dead friends, and a body with which to suffer that He might give us a
rebirth in freedom and love.
It was through her that He became the bridge between the Divine and the
human. If we take her away, then either God does not become man, or He that
is born of her is a man and not God. Without her we would no longer have Our
Lord! If we have a box in which we keep our money, we know that one thing we
must always give attention to is the key; we never think that the key is the
money, but we know that without the key we cannot get our money. Our Blessed
Mother is like the key. Without her we can never get to Our Lord, because He
came through her. She is not to be compared to Our Lord, for she is a
creature and He is a Creator. But if we lose her, we cannot get to Him. That
is why we pay so much attention to her; without her we could never
understand how that bridge was built between Heaven and earth.
It may be objected: "Our Lord is enough for me. I have no need of her."
But He needed her, whether we do or not. And, what is more important, Our
Blessed Lord gave us His Mother as our Mother. On that Friday men call Good,
when He was unfurled upon the Cross as the banner of salvation, He looked
down to the two most precious creatures He had on earth: His Mother and His
beloved disciple John. The night before, at the Last Supper, He had made His
last Will and Testament, giving us that which on dying no man was ever able
to give, namely, Himself in the Holy Eucharist. Thus He would be with us, as
He said, "all days unto the consummation of the world." Now in the darkening
shadows of Calvary, He adds a codicil to His will. There beneath the Cross,
not prostrate, as the Gospel notes, "stood" His Mother. As a Son, He thought
of His Mother; as a Savior, He thought of us. So He gave to us His Mother:
"Behold thy mother."
At last we see illumined the Gospel's description of His birth, namely,
that Mary "brought forth her first born and laid him in a manger." Her first
born. St. Paul calls Him the "first born of all creatures." Does that mean
that she was to have other children? Most certainly! But not according to
the flesh, for Jesus was Her only Son. But she was to have other children by
the spirit. Of these John is the first, born at the foot of the Cross, maybe
Peter is the second, James, the third, and all of us the millionth and
millionth of children. She gave birth in joy to Christ, Who redeemed us,
then she gave birth in sorrow to us, whom Christ redeemed! Not by a mere
figure of speech, not by a metaphor, but in virtue of Baptism did we become
children of Mary and brothers of Our Lord, Jesus Christ.
Just as we do not shrink from the thought of God giving us His Father,
so that we can pray: "Our Father," so neither do we rebel when He gives us
His Mother, so that we can pray: "Our Mother." Thus the Fall of man is
undone through another Tree, the Cross; Adam through another Adam, Christ;
and Eve through the new Eve, Mary.
Born of the Virgin Mary: this is a true statement not only of Christ but
also of every Christian, although in a lesser way. Every man is born of
woman in the flesh as a member of the race of Adam. He is also born of the
Woman in the Spirit if he is of the redeemed race of Christ. As she formed
Jesus in her body, so she forms Jesus in our souls. In this one Woman are
virginity and motherhood united, as if God willed to show us that both are
necessary for the world. Things separated in other creatures are united in
her. The Mother is the protector of the virgin, and the Virgin is also the
inspiration of motherhood.
One cannot go to a statue of a mother holding a babe, hack away the
mother, and expect to have the babe. Touch her and you spoil him. All other
world religions are lost in myth and legend except Christianity. Christ is
cut off from all the gods of paganism because He is tied to woman and to
history. "Born of the Virgin Mary; suffered under Pontius Pilate." Coventry
Patmore rightly calls Mary "Our only Savior from an abstract Christ." It is
easier to understand the meek and humble heart of Christ by looking at His
Mother. She holds all the great Truths of Christianity together, as a piece
of wood holds a kite. Children wrap the string of a kite around a stick and
release the string as the kite climbs to the heavens. Mary is like that
piece of wood. Around her we wrap all the precious strings of the great
Truths of our holy Faith, for example, the Incarnation, the Eucharist, the
Church. No matter how far we get above the earth, as the kite may, we always
have need of Mary to hold the [missing text].
Mary does not prevent our honoring Our Lord. Nothing is more cruel than
to say that she takes souls away from Christ. That could mean that Our Lord
chose a mother who is selfish, He Who is Love itself. If she kept us from
her Son, we would disown her! But is not she, who is the Mother of Jesus,
good enough for us sinners? We would never have had Our Divine Lord if He
had not chosen her.
We pray to the Heavenly Father, "Give us this day our daily bread."
Though we ask God for our daily bread, we do not hate the farmer and the
baker who help prepare it. Neither does the mother who gives the bread to
her child dispense with the Heavenly Provider. If the only charge Our Lord
has against us on Judgment Day is that we loved His Mother, then we shall be
very happy!
As our love does not start with Mary, so neither does it stop with Mary.
Mary is a window through which our humanity first catches a glimpse of
Divinity on earth. Or perhaps she is more like a magnifying glass; she
intensifies our love of her Son and makes our prayers more bright and
burning.
God, Who made the sun, also made the moon. The moon does not take away
from the brilliance of the sun. The moon would be only a burnt-out cinder
floating in the immensity of space were it not for the sun. All its light is
reflected from the sun. The Blessed Mother reflects her Divine Son; without
Him, she is nothing. With Him, she is the Mother of Men. On dark nights we
are grateful for the moon; when we see it shining, we know there must be a
sun. So in this dark night of the world when men turn their backs on Him Who
is the Light of the World, we look to Mary to guide their feet while we
await the sunrise.
[Excerpted from Bishop Fulton J. Sheen's The World's First Love: Mary,
Mother of God (1952; reprinted by Ignatius Press, 1996).]