Search this Site
Home
Contact
Feedback
Mail List
Anti-Catholicism
Catholic Apologetics
Catholic Calendar
Lent
Catholic Perspectives
Catholic Social Teaching
Christology
Church Around the
World
Church Contacts
Church Documents
Church History
Church Law
Church Teaching
Demonology
Doctors of the Church
Ecumenism
Eschatology
(Death, Heaven,
Purgatory, Hell)
Essays on Science
Evangelization
Fathers of the Church
Free Catholic Pamphlets
Heresies
and Falsehoods
Let There Be Light
Q & A on the Catholic Faith
Links
Liturgy
Mariology
Marriage & the Family
Modern Martyrs
Moral Theology
New Age
Occult
Political Issues
Prayer and Devotions
Pro-Life
Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults
Sacraments
Scripture
Spirituality
The
Golden Legend
Vatican
Vocation Links
& Articles
What the Cardinals believe...
World Religions
Pope John Paul II
In Memoriam
John Paul II
Beatification
Pope Benedict XVI
In Celebration

| |
Can You Prove God Exists?
Peter Kreeft
Before
we answer this question, we must distinguish five questions that are often confused.
-
First,
there is the question of whether something exists or not. A thing can exist
whether we know it or not.
-
Second,
there is the question of whether we know it exists. (To answer this question
affirmatively is to presuppose that the first question is answered affirmatively,
of course; though a thing can exist without our knowing it, we cannot know it
exists unless it exists.)
-
Third,
there is the question of whether we have a reason for our knowledge. We
can know some things without being able to lead others to that knowledge by reasons.
Many Christians think God's existence is like that.
-
Fourth,
there is the question of whether this reason, if it exists, amounts to a proof.
Most reasons do not. Most of the reasons we give for what we believe amount to
probabilities, not proofs. For instance, the building you sit in may collapse
in one minute, but the reliability of the contractor and the construction materials
is a good reason for thinking that very improbable.
-
Fifth,
if there is a proof, is it a scientific proof, a proof by the scientific
method, i.e., by experiment, observation, and measurement? Philosophical proofs
can be good proofs, but they do not have to be scientific proofs.
I
believe we can answer yes to the first four of these questions about the existence
of God but not to the fifth. God exists, we can know that, we can give reasons,
and those reasons amount to proof, but not scientific proof, except in an unusually
broad sense.
There are many arguments for God's existence, but most of them
have the same logical structure, which is the basic structure of any deductive
argument. First, there is a major premise, or general principle. Then, a minor
premise states some particular data in our experience that come under that principle.
Finally, the conclusion follows from applying the general principle to the particular
case.
In each case the conclusion is that God exists, but the premises
of the different arguments are different. The arguments are like roads, from different
starting points, all aiming at the same goal of God. In subsequent essays we will
explore the arguments from cause and effect, from conscience, from history, and
from Pascal's Wager.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Peter Kreeft. "Can You Prove God Exists?" excerpted from
Fundamentals
of the Faith.
This
article is reprinted with permission from Peter Kreeft.This text is also available
as an audio lecture under:
Arguments
for God's Existence
THE AUTHOR
Peter
Kreeft has written extensively (over
43 books) in the areas of Christian apologetics. Link to all of Peter Kreeft's
books
here.
Peter
Kreeft teaches at Boston College in Boston Massachusetts. He is on the Advisory
Board of the Catholic Educator's Resource Center.
Copyright © 2005
Peter
Kreeft

| |
|